| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
plus richer context menus (#114)
## The data-loss bug
User reported "even after clicking Save now I have lost my doc". Two causes:
1. **GoalChangePlugin only read children[1]** — it captured edits to the
single goal paragraph but silently dropped any typing that landed in
the trailing paragraph below the StepsBlock (or in extra paragraphs the
user had inserted). pendingGoalRef stayed at the persisted value, Save
now fired empty/stale content, the doc was overwritten.
2. **fireSave dropped localStorage immediately on save success.** If the
save persisted the wrong/empty content, the draft (which had the real
content) was already gone — no recovery path.
## Fixes
### Capture all body content
New `serializeGoalFromRoot` walks the entire root, skips only the H1 title
and the StepsBlock decorator, and emits multi-paragraph markdown joined by
blank lines. `GoalChangePlugin` and `fireSave` both call it now. Seed code
splits an existing multi-paragraph goal back into ParagraphNodes on load.
### Read directly from the editor at save time
`fireSave` now reads pendingGoalRef AND consults the live editor state via
`editor.getEditorState().read()`. If anything went wrong with OnChangePlugin
(which is rare, but possible — and was eating typing for many users), the
save still picks up the actual document body.
### Defensive pre-save flush
Before talking to the backend, `fireSave` writes the value to localStorage.
If the network fails, the page closes mid-flight, or anything else goes
sideways, the draft survives.
### Roundtrip-confirmed draft cleanup
We no longer drop the localStorage draft inside `fireSave`. Instead a new
effect watches `directive.goal` and clears the draft only when:
lastSavedValueRef === directive.goal === pendingGoalRef.current
i.e. only when the polled state confirms our save persisted AND the user
hasn't typed anything new in the meantime.
## Question notifications respect document mode
`SupervisorQuestionNotification` and `PhaseConfirmationToast` now route to
`/directives/<id>?task=<taskId>` (the doc-mode surface) when the user has
documentMode on AND the question carries a directiveId. Falls back to the
old `/exec/:taskId` route for non-doc-mode users.
## Richer directive folder context menu
In addition to start/pause/archive/delete/go-to-PR/new-draft we now expose:
- Advance DAG
- Plan orders
- Clean up
- Create / Update PR
All optional callbacks; the legacy tabular UI is unaffected.
## Richer task row context menu
In addition to interrupt/complete/fail/skip we now expose:
- Send message — browser prompt → sendTaskMessage (same wire as the
inline comment box)
- Open in task page — navigates to /exec/:taskId for the full task UI
(worktree diff viewer, checkpoint controls, etc.)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
steps, rename Mesh to Exec (#84)
* feat: soryu-co/soryu - makima: Rename Mesh to Exec in navigation
* WIP: heartbeat checkpoint
* WIP: heartbeat checkpoint
* WIP: heartbeat checkpoint
* feat: soryu-co/soryu - makima: Add contract-backed steps to directive flow
* WIP: heartbeat checkpoint
|
|
|
* Add phase_guard field to Contract model and database
This adds a new boolean field to control whether the supervisor should
wait for user confirmation before progressing to the next phase. When
enabled, users can review and potentially amend phase outputs (like
plans, requirements docs) before the contract continues.
Changes:
- Add migration for phase_guard column (defaults to false)
- Add phase_guard to Contract, CreateContractRequest, and
UpdateContractRequest structs
- Update create_contract_for_owner and update_contract_for_owner
repository functions to handle phase_guard
- Update all CreateContractRequest instantiations with phase_guard field
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat: Add phase_guard for contract phase transitions
Implement phase_guard logic in the advance_phase tool. When a contract
has phase_guard enabled, the phase transition now:
1. Asks for user confirmation before advancing
2. Allows users to request changes to phase deliverables
3. Passes feedback to the task without advancing if changes requested
Changes:
- Add phase_guard field to Contract model and CreateContractRequest
- Add PhaseTransitionRequest, PhaseFileInfo, PhaseTaskInfo structs
- Update ChangePhaseRequest with confirmed and feedback fields
- Update ContractToolRequest::AdvancePhase with confirmed/feedback
- Modify advance_phase handling in contract_chat.rs with phase_guard logic
- Update change_phase endpoint in contracts.rs with phase_guard support
- Add database migration for phase_guard column
When phase_guard=false: Phase advances immediately (current behavior)
When phase_guard=true: Returns pending_confirmation status with deliverables
If user provides feedback: Returns feedback to task, doesn't advance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(frontend): Add UI for phase transition confirmation requests
When phase_guard is enabled and a supervisor tries to advance the contract
phase, users now see a confirmation modal with:
- Current and proposed next phase visualization
- Phase deliverables checklist (if available)
- Summary of the phase work
- Options to "Approve & Advance" or "Request Changes" with feedback
Components added:
- PhaseConfirmationModal: Full modal dialog for phase confirmations
- PhaseConfirmationInline: Inline variant for task output view
- PhaseConfirmationNotification: Global notification wrapper
- PhaseConfirmationToast: Alternative toast-style notification
Integration:
- Added phase_confirmation message type to TaskOutput renderer
- Extended PendingQuestion API type with phase confirmation data
- Integrated notification into main app layout
The UI uses the existing supervisor question infrastructure (polling via
/api/v1/mesh/questions) and responds with APPROVE or CHANGES_REQUESTED
prefixed feedback.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(frontend): Add Phase Guard toggle to AutopilotPanel
Added the phase_guard toggle to the AutopilotPanel component, which allows
users to enable/disable requiring confirmation before phase transitions.
Changes:
- Added phaseGuard and autonomousLoop fields to Contract interface in api.ts
- Added phaseGuard field to UpdateContractRequest in api.ts
- Added Phase Guard toggle UI in AutopilotPanel with similar styling to master
- Toggle shows an 'active' badge when enabled
- Connected toggle to contract update API
The toggle appears below the autopilot control buttons and allows users to
require confirmation before the supervisor advances to the next phase.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
